🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising number of states are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". A law is expected to be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to pass a proposal increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a advisory motion supporting a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the move does not create binding law.

"An effective age limit is a solid starting point," stated a leading European lawmaker driving the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a potential ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "supported by robust research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. One foundation set up by the family of a girl who died after encountering harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," stated a influential peer.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, regulation is primarily happening at the state government level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a law barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law capping under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with any further access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws requiring guardian approval for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from some figures to follow Australia's lead, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from the West, additional nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, international agencies strike a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

As this international discussion unfolds, the steps of this nation and several other countries indicate that states globally are less and less willing to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.